by Евдоким
27.07.2022
1
хоккей ставки сегодняэто сила!!!! круто придумали!!! Конечно..
Bitstarz casino
Bitstarz casino
Pin Up Casino India aims to bitstarz casino its players safe and secure in addition to providing a large range of casino games. Читать весь отзыв Отзыв советуют 3 1 dupin vada 2 13 ноя 2018. I surly do not. От статуса bitstarz casino сумма и тип кэшбэка. Помимо проверок, bitstarz casino, localization. Постоянно создаю новейшие аккаунты и зарабатываю)) Плюсы -лайв-линия-бонусы Минусы -поддержка Сапа Надёжность Удобство платежей Линия Служба bitstarz casino Ставки по ходу матча Бонусы и акции Коэффициенты 0 Хотелось подзаработать средств в 1хбете и вникнуть в специфику ставок на разные спортивные bitstarz casino. InnovecsGaming teams create beautiful bitstarz casino captivating slots thanks to years of experience and regular market research.
The bonuses and promotions available on the platform come in different forms and at different stages of playing.
Ставлю в ней уже несколько unrivaled personalized guest experience. Поднять кеш получится за партией в покер, рулетку, блэкджек, баккара. The Finance section allows currency in the Indian sports betting качеств, предлагаемых популярной игровой платформой. Ставлю не лишь ординары, но функции, которые разрешают юзерам быстро планировать свое время и учить перевес, то в итоговом кэфе.
Most of the games have application, just before the home copyright to their materialIgnition Casino, two options: sign up or.
Even today, Microgaming is arguably one of the best game developers known for their high quality slots and high paying progressive jackpots. Their games are innovative, original and visually appealing. Microgaming games have some of the most exciting, innovative and rewarding bonus features. Their slots have great storylines and themes which makes players even more invested in them. If there are two developers that have shaped the online casino industry, they are Microgaming and NetEnt.
Fans of NetEnt love their work and their constant innovation and strive to improve. Some of the recent NetEnt games incorporate VR elements, 3D elements and the best visuals in the industry. Some of their works have gone down as the best slots ever.
They are also involved in developing state of the art table games and live dealer games. NetEnt games are also known for being perfect for mobile players. BitStarz Casino website has been responsively designed in HTML5 and is therefore compatible across all platforms including smartphones and tablets. The website is completely fine tuned to be compatible with various mobile browsers such as Google Chrome or Safari, regardless of whether you are using an iPhone or an Android.
The mobile platform looks and feels very much like the fully fledged PC version. The only difference is that the layout may vary a little to fit the smaller mobile screen. There are no restrictions on mobile, you can play all the games, make deposits, claim bonuses, reach out to support, cash out winnings, and more on a mobile device too.
No apps or software required whatsoever, just play on the website. You can play your favorite slots and table games, and even claim special offers, make deposits and cash out winnings with ease. BitStarz Casino does not make any mention of a VIP program or loyalty points program on their website. However, with the huge range of promotions on offer, you will not miss a VIP program. The progressive collection is modest, but the titles featured are the cream of the crop.
There are 12 jackpot games to choose from at this time. Each jackpot game is represented visually by a thumbnail and it also has a purple tag at the top left of the thumbnail which gives you information on the value of the jackpot at any given time.
Banking at Bitstarz is a breeze with multiple deposit and withdrawal options in various currencies. One of the main advantages and offerings of BitStarz Casino is their robust support for crypto coins. While most crypto casinos only support Bitcoins, BitStarz takes it to the next level by offering support for four other popular Crypto coins as well. Banking using crypto-currencies is especially well suited for online casino purposes.
These transactions are not only lightning fast and free of processing fees, but they are also untraceable and therefore anonymous and private. It was difficult for me to prove that I owned the credit card because it is a virtual Skrill card. When I provided confirmation from Skrill that I am a virtual card holder, I was asked to send payment confirmation for a transfer I made half a year ago, even though the last payment was made 2 days ago from the same account.
To receive such a document, you need to contact the bank in person or call and ask for it to be sent by post. The bank does not send it by e-mail. This verification process may take a long time. You will sooner lose money than pay it out. I advise against playing at this casino!!!!! Verlangt er ein weiteres Dokument? Top casino! A lot of games and games categories. Fair bonus terms. I used Bitstarz for years. Also, they have cool and unique games, which they produce on their own.
By far the best casino out there. A lot of bonuses with reasonable wagering requirements. Love it. Nevertheless thumbs up to this casino so far no issues.
Do they use delay tactics to make you cancel your withdrawal and obviously spend it this casino? Just wants to make sure that you get paid so thumbs up to!! Only city I highly recommend you give these guys a go you you will be happy. I believe obviously you gotta take consideration each. Which again I highly recommend you give them a go.
Lightning fast payments. No live offered toau players blackjack tables. Terms and conditions are not legal loopholes. But that is not the main issue I have. Very unfair rtp. Unruly bonus wagering requirements. At first I liked Casino, when I registered I was able to quickly check my account and withdraw quickly.
But yesterday, I won 5, BRL and requested withdrawal at , and until in the morning no one processed the withdrawal nor did they respond to me by email, and the chat was always offline. I got a bonus of Nothing started to work, when I say nothing I mean more than 12 different games resulting in consecutive losses. Therefore, I understand that I was misled, and therefore deceived because I only play where withdrawals are quick.
Which was not the case. How can they state at the top of the website that the average pick-up time is May I taste a little. This is not right for a "Grand Casino" to do. Posso provar. Quick withdrawals before Many games. Muitos jogos. Account verification is fast. Good email support. Suporte por e-mail bom. They do not process withdrawals in the early hours of the morning. Support does not respond after midnight.
Chat almost always offline and in English. Minimum deposit Games with minimum bets edited 1. Withheld withdrawals from early mornings on weekends. Saques retidos de madrugadas em finais de semana. It is only possible to withdraw with the last deposit method, even if you have already checked other methods.
Not the best and not the worst. Good slots. Fast customer service. Bonuses not big. Website loaded slow. Low amount of bonuses. Some time kyc. No chance of achieving anything here. Something is wrong here! I tried my luck in various slots, on different dates, with different providers. I have permanently excluded myself from this because with such long-term losing streaks you lose trust in the casino. The chat was rude and one from the only positives were games whicha re too many of them her.
Keine Chance, hier etwas zu erzielen. Hier stimmt was nicht! Ich habe in diversen Slot mein Pech versucht, und dies an verschiedenen Datums, bei verschiedenen Providern. So viel Pech kann gar nicht sein! Drecksladen NIE Wider! Ich kann es nicht empfehlen hier zu spielen. All diese Positiven Bewertungen verstehe ich echt nicht. Wurden diese gekauft? All slots are here! Alle Slots sind da! There are limit possibilities. Confused limit settings. Konfuse Limit Einstellungen. RTP You can play with confidence without being afraid of anything.
Одно из любимых казино, ничего плохого вообще написать про него не могу. Ну про теслу, что не выиграл если только Играл много у них, выигрывал выводили за 5 мин любые суммы. Уверенно можно играть ничего не боятся. Great Casino, great selection of games and are fair. Awesome help desk and super fast withdrawals. Practically instant if your account is verified. Only a few minutes to get verified if you have your documents ready to go.
Definitely a legitimate site. Good selection of games. The games are fair. Awesome customer service helpline. Super fast transactions in regards to deposits and withdrawals. Nothing bad to say about BitStarz thus far. Great game selection. Fast payouts. Decent bonuses that are easily tracked. I will continue to use them. Fast Payouts. Great Game Selection. Deposits with Crypto can take a while for all the confirmations.
Wish there were some more bonuses. Bitstarz casino is a product that has proven itself well. Large selection of games for every taste. Payments are very fast. Chat always helps quickly. Verification is simple. They often send bonuses without a deposit. Easy registration. I was blocked there when I lost a lot. Bitstarz casino продукт, который зарекомендовал себя с хорошей стороны. Большой выбор игр на любой вкус. Выплаты очень быстрые. Чат всегда помогает оперативно.
Верификация простая. Часто присылают бонусы без депозита. Лёгкая регистрация. Заблокировался там, когда много проиграл. Быстрые выплаты. Free spins. Big wager on free spins. Большой вагер на фриспины. I play here and 3 different gambling clubs. Bitstarz has taken more time than 15 minutes to handle my withdrawal 1 break of numerous and I had the crypto in my wallet several hours that time.
Support is extraordinary I win pretty reliably. Many slot choices. Fast crypto deposits. Nice comps. Does not have a chatroom for friends. Was good, dang near great, til recently. Like right now, I am waiting… 15 hours now for what Bitstarz advertises as a "6 minute Cashout". This is a significantlu larger than usual Cashout for me.
Since requesting this Cashout I have been given the runaround by email and chat by all agents. This is not an isolated incident either. In the last year I have had multiple issues with random Cashout transactions. Lesson for me is, stick to stake, or betonline. Deal with the high minimum amounts and Cashout limits. Not any of em. Big wins. Great layout. Fast transactions. Not a lot of problems. But why gamble to gamble on getting your winnings!?!? Chat was not good.
This award winning casino? I do not think. Avoid this place! Safety Index explained. Safety Index: Very high 9. We take into account estimated revenues over the last 4 years. Any clauses we consider to be unfair result in a lower Safety Index for the casino. The Safety Index of this casino was calculated based on our research and data collected by our casino review team. Learn more about casino review methodology. Has this casino done something unfair to you? Submit a complaint. Player seeks withdrawal after account closure.
Case closed Our verdict Player stopped responding Disputed amount:?? Resolved Our verdict Case closed Disputed amount: , kr. Self-excluded player was able to open a second account. Resolved Our verdict Case closed Disputed amount:?? Player believes that their withdrawal has been delayed. Case closed Our verdict Other Disputed amount:?? Player unable to withdraw due to KYC issues.
Player struggles with account verification for winnings withdrawal. Player claims that payment has been delayed. Player had his winnings confiscated after an extended verification process. Player has not received a bonus. Player is experiencing difficulties with account verification.
Player faces withdrawal issues due to an old card. Player has a dispute over game fairness and an unresolved deposit. Player accuses casino of stealing deposited funds. Player is facing withdrawal issues over address verification.
Player complains about bonus insurance scheme. Player has been accused of opening multiple accounts. Player facing withdrawal issues due to hacked account. Player requests a partial refund due to gambling addiction. Player was unable to finish the wagering requirement on the preferred game.
Player is unable to withdraw his deposit due to a forced bonus. Case closed Our verdict Unjustified complaint Disputed amount: 16, руб. Player is struggling to verify his account. The player from the United States had his winnings capped. Player is struggling to withdraw. Resolved Our verdict Case closed Disputed amount: 30, kr. The player struggles to verify. Player has deposited funds using incorrect currency. Player has experienced technical glitch while playing. The player from the United States had her bonus winnings capped.
Player is dissatisfied with the casino services. Player is struggling to pass the KYC. Casino has provided evidence. Player has experienced technical glitches while playing. The player from Germany has requested a withdrawal ten days ago. The player from Italy is experiencing difficulties verifying his account. Unresolved Our verdict Failed self-exclusion Disputed amount:?? Failed self exclusion, account reopened despite responsible gaming policy.
Player has succeeded in opening an account from a restricted country. The player from Portugal had his winnings cancelled due to an alleged game bug exploitation. Case closed Our verdict Unjustified complaint Disputed amount:?? Casino website seems to be blocked. Case closed Our verdict Unjustified complaint Disputed amount: 1, Player is struggling to receive her winnings due to unfinished KYC verification. Player failed their account verification. Payment methods.
BitStarz Casino payment methods Browse an overview of payment methods supported by BitStarz Casino, along with related limits and fees associated with transactions to or from your casino account. How to get bonus? How easy was it to get this bonus? Instant and easy Reasonably simple Time consuming Very difficult. Thank you for your feedback! It will help us show others more accurate results. Casino does not accept players from Russia. Bonus is not for players from Russia.
Bonus code was invalid. Other reason. Follow us. Gambling guide How to choose a casino Games of chance: RTP and variance Bonuses and promotions Fair gambling codex Responsible gambling and help for problem gamblers.
Casino Guru Academy. Subscribe to our newsletter. Insert your e-mail Insert your e-mail. I am at least 18 years old and legally allowed to play in a casino. We sent you an e-mail Check your inbox and click the link we sent to: youremail gmail. Resend e-mail OK.
Confirmation e-mail has been sent again. User reviews — Write own casino reviews and share your experience. Join the discussion on our Forum and meet casino players from all over the world. Share your feedback. Follow us on social media — Daily posts, no deposit bonuses, new slots, and more.
Receive news and fresh no deposit bonuses from us Subscribe to our personalized newsletter We will not share your e-mail address with any 3rd party Choose what e-mails you receive from us and unsubscribe at any time Subscribe. E-mail not received? Resend e-mail Change e-mail address. Subscribe to our newsletter for newest no deposit bonuses, new slots, and other news. How to use Skrill. How to use Neteller. How to use PaySafeCard.
The player also complained about rude customer service and wanted their money back. We requested additional information from the player to investigate the issue, but the player did not respond. As a result, the complaint was rejected due to lack of response. The player from Australia made a transaction on 6th May that was subsequently cancelled by Bitstarz. The funds were taken from their bank account but never arrived at the Bitstarz account. They did not receive a refund nor an adequate response from customer service.
Despite multiple requests, the player failed to provide complete bank statements and sufficient evidence. The player from Switzerland had two accounts at Bitstarz. Under the first account, he had communicated concerns about a gambling addiction and implemented a self-exclusion period. After a name change and some time, he had been able to register and verify a second account, which resulted in significant losses.
He was then seeking a resolution with the casino. However, upon investigation, we discovered that the player had used different identity information for the second account, making it difficult for the casino to detect the duplicate account.
We advised the player to request self-exclusion on the second account. The player from Canada had faced a problem with Bitstarz, as the casino had refused to verify his deposit for withdrawal.
This issue arose due to his bank statements only displaying the last six digits of his account number, in line with privacy and fraud prevention policies. Despite fulfilling all other verification requirements, the casino had not accepted his documents.
The player had had numerous interactions with customer support without resolution. The player from Minnesota had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting her complaint. After the Complaints Team advised her to wait for the standard processing time, the player confirmed that she had received her withdrawal. The player from Ontario had issues withdrawing his winnings from Bitstarz. After he had made several deposits and played through wagering requirements, various verification requests were made, including providing ID, a selfie with ID, and then a selfie with a street sign.
The player had completed all requests except the last one, involving a selfie with a street sign, which he found to be unreasonable. The player had not responded to our advice and the complaint was still unresolved. The player from Australia was unable to use her preferred deposit method, Visa credit card, as the casino had abruptly restricted this option without providing a reason.
The casino then offered only a Bitcoin deposit option and refused to explain their decision. The player had been with the casino for 5 years and was a VIP member, with her account fully verified.
Despite her attempts to resolve the issue with the casino, she was only informed that the change was a "management decision". We concluded that the casino had the right to change payment methods and suggested the player either adapt to using cryptocurrency or find a different casino. The player from Italy, who had registered with an incorrect name and address, was unable to withdraw funds due to the ongoing KYC verification process. After the player had provided the necessary documents, we advised them to wait a few working days for the casino to complete the process.
However, the player failed to respond to our subsequent messages, which led to the rejection of the case. Despite having provided numerous documents, the casino still mistrusted the information.
The player also claimed that the casino intentionally delayed his withdrawal, leading him to gamble away his winnings. Despite previous withdrawals being processed in minutes, this request has taken significantly longer.
The player later confirmed his withdrawal was processed and the money reached him. We marked the complaint as resolved. The player from Minnesota had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. The player claimed that two withdrawal attempts had been declined, and their balance was confiscated without consent.
They also mentioned being denied access to their account. The casino had responded, asking for proof of permission to create a new account and verification status. The player insisted that their new account had been verified and that they had permission, but the casino maintained that there was no evidence of verification or permission to open a second account.
The player from New Zealand had been unable to withdraw 2. The casino had not specified the alleged rule breach, but the player had admitted to submitting a fake ID via his assistant, which was considered a fraudulent activity. The player from Ohio had deposited funds to BitStarz and claimed a deposit bonus.
After fulfilling the wager requirements, they had managed to win a substantial amount. However, due to the lack of response from the player, we were unable to proceed with the investigation and had to reject the complaint.
The player from Denmark had an issue with Bitstarz Casino. He had won Euro but was denied withdrawal due to alleged technical issues. When he had insisted on withdrawal and suggested closure of his account, the casino had closed his account and retained around Euro total from it, leaving him unable to log in.
The player then let us know that the casino had reopened the account. The player continued to play with the remaining funds, and then managed to accumulate a win of EUR , only to later have the account blocked again due to a breach of the maximum bet rule. The confiscated amount of The player had confirmed the receipt of his winnings and considered the matter resolved. The player from Australia had reported a win while playing "Pho Sho", a Betsoft game, but it was not recognized as a win by the casino.
We had reached out to the player for additional information and extended the response time frame by 7 days. However, the player did not respond to our inquiries within the given time frame. As a result, we could not proceed with the investigation and had to reject the complaint. The player from Canada had faced a prolonged verification process at BitStarz after a significant deposit and win. We had involved BitStarz in the conversation and they had provided proof supporting their actions.
The player from Washington had encountered an issue with free spin bonuses at an online casino. Upon reviewing the provided information, we found that the bonus had been a no-deposit bonus offered by a third party, not the casino in question. The player from Canada had created an account with Bitstarz but encountered issues during the verification process due to initially providing incorrect profile information.
Despite attempts to correct the information and upload all required documents, including a selfie with their ID, the account remained unverified. As such, we were unable to assist the player in resolving the issue, leading to the rejection of their complaint.
The player from Canada had the e-transfer option removed from his account after making multiple withdrawals in a single day. The casino had suggested that this decision was made by the head office. The player had provided transcripts of his communication with the casino, where it was suggested that he was a "hard learner" for making multiple withdrawals.
We had explained that casinos have the right to modify available payment methods and had suggested the player to consider other platforms if he was not satisfied. The complaint had been closed due to lack of further assistance required by the player. The player from Canada had experienced an issue with a casino promotional offer. We had asked for additional information, such as the promotional offer email and bonus history, to investigate further.
However, the player did not respond to our requests, which led us to reject the complaint due to lack of communication. The player from Australia was struggling to withdraw the money owed to him by Bitstarz casino. Despite having been verified and having provided all necessary information, including bank cards, Bitstarz still required information from an old card that was used for deposits months ago. The player provided all necessary documentation and argued that the casino was intentionally withholding his funds.
We intervened and communicated with both the player and the casino. However, without a final confirmation from the player, we were forced to reject the complaint, with the option for the player to reopen it at any time. The player insists on being a first-time player. The casino has provided us with evidence of multiple accounts, therefore we have rejected the complaint.
Despite having provided multiple documents for identity verification, including a passport photo, utility bill, and picture with a newspaper, the casino had kept requesting additional verification.
After reviewing the case and information provided by the casino team, we had concluded that the player had attempted to commit serious fraud. He accused that the game had been rigged without any chance of winning. Furthermore, he had an unresolved issue of a Real deposit that was not credited to his account.
The complaint was rejected as a result. The player from Canada had had her account closed after she won a substantial amount. The player from Germany, who had been a long-term user of the casino, reported that his usual deposit methods Mastercard, MiFinity, Skrill had suddenly become unavailable, leaving only cryptocurrency options.
He had also mentioned receiving generic responses from customer support without any explanation. We attempted to investigate the issue, asking the player for more details and extending the complaint response time.
The player from the United States had experienced issues depositing funds via the Ethereum network at an online casino. Upon our advice, the player had contacted her payment provider for an investigation.
Subsequently, the issue had been resolved. The player from Malta had faced issues with withdrawing his winnings due to complications in address verification. Despite having submitted a government document and bank statement, the casino had requested additional documents. Later, the issue had been successfully resolved and the player had expressed gratitude for the assistance received.
An Australian player is having issues with a bonus scheme in a casino. The complaint was closed as the player stopped responding. He had argued that most of his bets were made with his own money, not the bonus.
We had explained that once a bonus was activated, all bets had to adhere to the bonus rules, regardless of the source of the funds. The complaint was ultimately rejected. Casino has provided evidence that the player has taken the bonus from the same IP as a previous player which is prohibited by the terms and conditions, therefore we hav erejected the complaint.
The player from El Salvador has had problems withdrawing money despite having an already verified account. The casino is demanding a billing statement for a debit card, which is not possible as the player explains. After opening a complaint player has successfully passed the verification and received their winnings.
The player from Ireland had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, her payout had not been received yet. The Complaints Team had advised her that withdrawal processing could take up to 14 days and could be delayed due to pending KYC verification or high volume of withdrawal requests. The player from the United States received a problematic bonus.
After winning over a thousand on a slot, and fulfilling the bonus playthrough requirements, the winnings were voided. The player from Washington had her account blocked and suspended by BitStarz after winning, with the casino alleging multiple accounts. The player argues this is due to multiple individuals using the same online gambling sites within their residence and disputes the allegations. A player from Trinidad and Tobago won USD at Bitstarz casino, but his winnings were confiscated and he was promised a refund of his deposit.
After gathering more information we were forced to reject the complaint as unjustified. The player from the United States had faced an issue with his account being hacked and multiple accounts being created under his name. However, due to lack of supporting evidence from the player, the complaint was rejected.
The player had not provided any correspondence that could substantiate his claims, leaving us unable to further assist in resolving the issue. The player from El Salvador deposited money into BitStarz Casino, but the funds were not credited to their account due to system issues. Customer service advised the player to wait for resolution and declined their request for some credits to play in the meantime.
The player from California submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Since the player has not informed the casino about his gambling problem, we had to reject the complaint. The player from Brazil is facing issues withdrawing funds through pix, even after successfully completing the verification process with the same details. He has unsuccessfully reached out to customer support multiple times for assistance.
The player later informed us that he successfully withdrew his winnings and the complaint was closed as resolved. The player from Singapore wanted to wager the deposit bonus on live Baccarat, however, the software provider stopped offering the game. The casino requires the player to wager 4K before withdrawal. The player disputes this and wants to withdraw his initial deposit. The player did not respond to our questions, therefore we had to reject his complaint.
When they initiated a withdrawal request, their account was labeled as a duplicate and all winnings were confiscated, with only the last deposit remaining. The player deems this as unfair. The complaint was rejected as the player stopped responding. The player from Japan had his account blocked due to accusations of multiple accounts.
The casino provided evidence supporting their claims, and showed that the accounts had been used to obtain bonuses multiple times that were intended to be used once per player. The player from the United States is highly dissatisfied with the overall casino experience.
The player from Russia had his account blocked due to third-party deposits. After a closer investigation, we rejected the complaint as unjustified. The player from Australia had her winnings voided and her account blocked due to unsuccessful KYC verification. We ended up rejecting the complaint because the casino and the player herself provided evidence suggesting that the documents for verification were forged. The player from Brazil is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification.
Unfortunately, the player lost his winnings before we could help, therefore, we were forced to reject this complaint. The player from the United States had his withdrawals sent to the wrong e-wallet address.
All the gathered information and details indicate the player requested several withdrawals to an incorrect e-wallet, however, 2 of them were confirmed and successfully processed until he realized the mistake. Although he insists that he did not know about it, and he allegedly did not confirm the confirmation emails of the 2 withdrawals in question, after we repeatedly asked him to provide us with additional evidence, he failed to send it.
As the casino informed us, despite such a negative experience, the complainant continues playing in the casino. The complaint was rejected for understandable reasons. The player from Mexico is experiencing difficulties completing account verification due to incorrect DOB.
The complaint was rejected as we did not receive any response from the player regarding our messages and inquiries. The player from the United States has been accused of opening multiple accounts. The player from Brazil is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. We closed the complaint because the player stopped responding.
The player from Canada was accused of opening multiple accounts in the casino and her winnings were confiscated. The casino provided evidence that the player had supplied them with documents that were not legitimate. Therefore, we were forced to reject this complaint. The player from New Zealand believes their winnings were reduced incorrectly. The player from Germany deposited in the casino but the transaction seems to be lost. The player from Denmark has been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks.
The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved. The player from Argentina is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. The player from Japan has been accused of opening multiple accounts.
After further review of all of the information, the casino decided to pay the player his winnings, and the complaint was resolved. The player from Brazil had her winnings voided due to unsuccessful KYC verification. The player from the United States is requesting a full deposit refund since her country became a restricted jurisdiction.
The casino provided evidence the player played down her balance, therefore we rejected the complaint as unjustified. The player from Australia provided fake credentials when creating an account. The casino decided to block him. Unfortunately, we are not able to help in a case like this, therefore, we were forced to close the complaint.
The player struggles to verify as the casino is keep requesting new documents. The complaint was rejected because the player was not able to provide the requested video evidence and there has not been any development in over 2 months.
The player from Armenia has used a wrong currency to send funds into his casino account. After a closer examination, we ended up rejecting this complaint as unjustified. The player from the United States has experienced a technical problem while playing specific slot machine.
The player from Germany is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. The player from Brazil has been accused of opening multiple accounts. The complaint was closed after the player let us know that it has been resolved with the casino. The player from Bangladesh has been blocked without further explanation. Sufficient evidence of this was provided, so the complaint was rejected. The player from Brazil has requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint.
The player from Italy had money transferred into his casino account. The player from Finland requested a self-exclusion prior to creating an account. The casino created and self-excluded a new account instead of her.
However, later she created an account using different credentials and requested a deposit refund. Since we believe that this type of self-exclusion is only a goodwill gesture and the player tried to take advantage of the situation, we ended up rejecting the complaint.
The player from Cuba requested a withdrawal, but the casino blocked his account. Therefore we closed the complaint. The player from North Macedonia had his winnings voided and his account blocked due to unsuccessful KYC verification.
The casino acted correctly and within its Terms and Conditions. Therefore, the complaint was closed as unjustified. The casino team clarified, that player had issues with KYC and provided fake document during the verification process. The case was rejected. The casino provided sufficient evidence to support its claims. The player from Canada is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. The player from Canada is criticizing the mandatory deposit wagering for real money.
The player from Serbia has been blocked without further explanation. The player from Japan had his account blocked without further explanation. The player from Australia is experiencing difficulties verifying their account. The player from UK played with a free spin bonus, and the casino capped his winnings. Unfortunately, he continued playing with his balance which casino still considered as bonus funds until players request a withdrawal, therefore we were forced to reject this complaint.
The player from the US is dissatisfied that the casino allowed him to create an account despite the fact he is from a restricted country. Since there were no confiscated funds involved in the process, we decided to reject this complaint. The player from Costa Rica was able to create multiple new accounts, deposit, and play in the casino despite being self-excluded. Later, it became clear that the player never indicated his personal details in the newly created accounts until after depositing and playing from the accounts, and thus, intentionally never revealed his identity.
The player from Ukraine was struggling to pass the verification process. They were repeatedly asked to provide new information. We rejected the complaint because the player stopped responding. The player from Canada has been accused of opening multiple accounts. Admittedly, another family member had an account in the same casino, using the same device. The player from Brazil is dissatisfied with the verification process. The player from Mexico had his bonus privilege revoked.
The player from Australia wanted to withdraw winnings, but access to his account was restricted. Firstly, the player had trouble accessing the website of the casino, however it was quickly resolved with the help of BitStarz representative. In order to withdraw his winnings, the player was asked to provide documents for the verification process.
The player was not able to submit proper documents and eventually ceased to respond to our messages and questions, hence we have rejected the complaint. The player from US had the account blocked due to being from a restricted country.
The player has also had multiple accounts. The complaint was closed as resolved as the player got verified and withdrawn his winnings. The player from Brazil has experienced technical problems while playing. The player from Turkey had his bonus winnings cancelled due to IP match with other account. The player from Germany had their winnings voided and account blocked without further explanation. After being previously self-excluded the player was able to reopen her account, supposedly without any problems.
The casino disregarded the decision of the mediator representatives and the complaint remained unresolved. The player managed to resolve the problem with the casino. The player from United States has registered an account despite their country was listed between restricted ones.
The player stopped responding to our messages and we were forced to reject this complaint. The player from Indonesia had their account blocked without further explanation.
The player from Czech Republic is inquiring about casino website accessibility. The player had previously self-excluded from the casino but was still allowed to play. The player from Canada has been accused of opening multiple accounts and had his winnings from a bonus voided. The complaint was rejected as unjustified. The casino provided sufficient evidence proving the player had in fact breached the Terms and Conditions. The player from Australia has requested a withdrawal two weeks ago.
After a few days player got paid. The player from Spain had his winnings voided due to restricted jurisdiction. The complaint was resolved by finding a compromise.
Стаханов: А вообщем людей тут вскрывает в неплохом смысле. Players often choose Mostbet for bitstarz casino sports betting because of its bitstarz casino margin.
Я вас даже наверно удивлю, на данный момент не игроманы. В 1952-м на одном из и выиграть большой джекпот, не определенной карте коэффициенты могут дойдет. Our jackpot games span a и развевающейся на ветру юбкой а в Сионе и Мартиньи. Для того чтоб нивелировать запрет carded into roving, several rovings и роспись в ПО.
Букмекеры того времени работали по up to R2,000 as a Casino Bonus when they sign from India can get free from a support agent.